Capitalism is crashing under his own immensly overrated stupid greed…so, what!….Humanity will survive it! Friday, Aug 19 2011 

I am almost amused seeing exactly those kind of gamblers who create a destructred chaos they, acting out the ‘responsible wise’ of an economy, have elevated to the only
doctrine worth attention. The fashion obedient tie does not make the mature adult. These ridiculous hazardous spirits pretending to care about the safety of countries and the politicians echoing them, makes me think that first, these people are completly missing self irony, and second, that their stiff minds are by far not the full human potential, but only a very narrow option.

The stubborn insistence to pretend saving from disaster by repeating the same absurd non solutions, is more and more looking like as if all those still believing in saving this sinking ship are on a very strange delusional substance.
Could it be they confuse plus value with life energy?
What miserable boring loveless lives, these poor people must have.
Their middle class followers wake up slowly from their dreams of eternal bounty participation and realise it was a pernicious nightmare, but some are still addicted to the mantra, and are willing to follow the worse wannabe leaders who promise to preserve their privileges.
They like to confuse privileges with gratification of their supposed work ethical superiority, when in reality its their own system grooming laziness to include all dimensions which has created the mess for decades. Without a thoughtless middle class, no evil system can function, they are making the evil possible through their unwillingness to oppose themselves to it in an early stage. The middle class are the ones who support dehumanising destruction even if they rant about limited or even surface details. Their main addiction is still to preserve some illusory safeties even under the worse conditions, thinking they deserve it for being seen to behave well.
Those go betweens, who expected to earn more crumbles from the cake, will have to realise their disastrous function in class division.  It is they who have acted the pompous patronising servants to the rich at the expense of the poor. Well obviously that didn’t help! Expecting to preserve their own privileges or a pension, by making other peoples lives more fragile, is not going to work!
Everybody is poor in a dehumanised system and the so-called wealthy even more as they still don’t notice what they are missing in themselves.
As everthing is connected with everything, unbalance affects all.

If we don’t want to suffocate under this inefficiency to cooperate with reality we need to reinvent how we live our lives to preserve life on this planet .

I repeat myself, as I warn since so long….but maybe now it now becomes more evident to many, even if I am sure that some nouveaux riches delusions can be very stubborn.

After having reduced all aspects of life to a resource serving the economical profit of few,
It is necessary to rediscover our true surviving optimum, which was, is and will always be: compassion and solidarity.

I have the impression as this era is ending, a far better life is possible.

About famine, speculation, charity, cynism and humanity. Wednesday, Jul 27 2011 

Anything to say,

maybe about the connection between speculation and climate change?

maybe about the connection between speculation and perpetuation of wars?

maybe about the connection between speculation on resources and starvation?

maybe about the role of charity organisations in a system of greed?

maybe about media , sensationalism and information quality of news?

maybe about the possible profit expected through “improving” zones  who have been destroyed before?

No?

Thought so!

This world needs social justice, not tax deductible charity!

Why I am not suprised, that some are surprised about right-wing terror. Monday, Jul 25 2011 

My first intuition, as I heard from this horrible violence inflicted on the Norwegian society was : … a right-winger!. I did not exclude rationaly other options, especially as the insitence to point at islamists was obviously the first reaction of other, but later I was, like often, confirmed to have been right.

My thoughts go first, before I follow my analyse, to the victims, their families and friends who have to face their hurt . I remember holding the hand of someone who had expirienced such a violent intrusion in his life, and was reacting with fear, each time he heard a firework or other sound reminding him his traumatic expirience. I understand how hard it must be for them now, and probably for a long time. May they at least know, that many are feeling with them, and wish that they might find back to a trust into life, this person without empathy has tried to destroy.

The media goes on repeating flat statements about the scandinavian social peacefull coherence, neglecting the increasing destructuration of this concept through a disdainfull nouveaux riches egotism, the confusion assuming that more bureaucracy creates egalitarism, that social control neglecting individuality and social solidarity are the same, and the contradiction of love for nature and resource exploitation for a privileged way of life. Even the classical parties or the media are more and more inclined to use reactionary concepts imposing more rigourosity to hide the disatrous effects of a deregulated market . What is left, is often only the old shine of social concern, which mostly is a puritan vision of a non controvertial/confronterial community.This tendency can be observed in many countries.

The great blindness towards the potential of violence of the extreme right wing is not innocent, it is systematic for those in society who consider it as ethically acceptable to repeat the propaganda phrases of those groups for their own political or social careerism and those who join dehumanised visions dividing humans, out of their own pride issues.

How much is it a cliche to consider psychopathic violence as an unforseeable outburst?
How many look-away situations are included in this concept of destinity?

As long acting cool and careless, dividing society into winner and losers is
too often still considered as virile determinism serving a greed who legitimates herself as worthiness deserving privileges, even if it leads to destruction of democracys, neglect of human needs, social structures and environment for a bit of individual prestige build on vanity….as long this pretend normality is not seen as doing the evil it does, …it will remain difficult to recognise those who overfulfil this attitude sociopathically .

Let s have the courage, to oppose real emotions to violent behaviour.
Cynicism expects to be seen as witty, but our hearts knows that empathy, compassion and solidarity is our real intelligence.

Is a certain illusion of safety worth the neglect of essential human rights? Monday, May 9 2011 

Considering that the surveillance society who has been legitimated through the “war against terrorism” has succeed to put each citizen under suspicion, allowing the control of our privacy for this higher goal, I ask myself what has created the most damage on our democracy’s ?

The old adage seems still pertinent making us ask who profits from a certain atmosphere of fear.

About the difference between etiquette and respect Sunday, May 1 2011 

I see that many use the therm of etiquette, confusing it with ethic,  as if it was the appropriate word for co mutual human respect. Mostly the same who assume that being nice is the only appropriate attitude in communication. Wonders what kind of intellectual debates are possible on such a confluent soil.

Etiquette means label in French, and the therm got used as concept how to behave appropriate towards an elite . It fits a certain superficial  narcissistic era to choose such hierarchical mannerism as base of human relationship.

Even in  a society where many limits their vocabulary to describe the other with such words like awesome or troll, a bit of culture might inform them that their overused word nice, comes from the Latin word nescius/ignorant.

Dividing into positive/negative concepts by repeating simplistic phrases is not creating a respectful situation for human communication, but neglect that those new dogmas can be used as new forms of territory bullying  by many who consider the challenge of their reality concept already as an offence.

Can we not question ourself about the true philosophical ethical value of what we assume as the right way?  Real respect towards our co human is natural to free human. To limit the minds to obedience of arbitrary convenient rules  is an insult to intelligence, creativity , engagement and compassion. It is a form of reductionist violence. It mistrust philosophically the human capacity to care for other human and their needs thoughtfully and the ability to solve problems  out of the own motivation for cooperation even in divergence, without rules imposed by authority structures, who s interests in  self determination can be questioned .

Historically we can associate this artificial well behaving obsession to each nouveau rich/petit bourgeois middle class attempt to flatter upwards and kick out critical voices challenging their uncultivated short sighted success concepts. The absurd ridicule of such attitudes is evident and has inspired many fine spirits over the century’s, their non respect of brain blocking  concepts is the base of our culture overcoming bigotry and despotism.

Not everybody welcomes a word based on calming pills , diluted thoughts and scissors in the head neglecting the real dehumanising and destruction out of sight for the comfort of flat mainstream agreement.

As we could observe in the last, democratic processes are about sharing openly ideas and arguments, not about controlling them down to please regimes in need of resigned citizen fearful of free speech.

A vivid democracy and culture requires engagement, not an absolutist  posturing confusing  affectations with ethical values.

A society who wrap’s herself in the privileged avoidance of conflicts, during the human rights gets neglect to provide such a lifestyle , is hypocritical . The shallow resonance of such therms like etiquette or political correctness points towards the cynical missing of real ethical structures organising life. Do we hear about an etiquette of those instrumenting the internet for business  profit or citizen control? Do we see political correctness increasing ecological awareness or social justice?

This disease confusing the packaging with the substance, is rampant and has created already a quiet generalised disastrous over adjusted  mentality.  During this… real rough life exists on earth !

I dont need a nuclear necessity! Tuesday, Apr 12 2011 

Wished we could afford more de-central alternative energy (we work towards it!) for more independence , but already by reducing our use of electricity…

may I proudly announce that our household has succeed to reduce the already low electricity bill to the half !

What keeps you back from doing the same?

Disastrous addictions can be cured if one understands how destructive for society and one self, they are.

Do we need more resource greedy gimmicks, or more care of our real  human needs ?

Strange spring, petals and particles in the air Saturday, Mar 26 2011 

I hear, the victims in Japan need our charity. I had heard, Japan is one of the richest country in the world with a high grade of social and technological sophistication.

How comes, the help given to those poor people, reminds me the situation once in New Orleans?

The solidarity I can have, is feeling with the simple people who show their feelings …it is human!. I don’t join in, praising the so called special character in adversity. Do I hear from their own wealthy people helping ? Don t be too humble telling, beside stock market stabilisation and production concerns. At least, I see some in the population getting angry, and I hear even system critical voices inside the country. At least, they know that Japan s culture is not only about obedience.

Remember, the Chernobyl disaster was also at spring, when all wanted to enjoy life after a long winter. And here we go again. I feel sad looking at my garden . How must it be, to look at nature these days over there.

Learn to listen to Cassandra before they call catastrophes unexpected Monday, Mar 14 2011 

Natural catastrophes are overwhelming situations, humanity has learned to handle with common solidarity over the century.

Human made catastrophes are mostly the results of a long neglect of problems and something we could consider as a partial society amnesia of reality and a hybris projection of the own capacity’s to handle the future.

The problems occurring are than deeper as they have to overcome a generalised desensitisation who had exclude critical voices  out of consciousness. Suddenly the expectation for scientific wonder appears like very irrational wishes for pious miracles who will not come.

Instead of considering nature as our worse enemy and by that also doubting the wisdom of our own nature , let s question ourself if we allow to be impressed by pseudo serious posturing imposing us a highly artificial lifestyle for the sake of some divisive economy and if this is truly a cultivated healthy form of society with life quality hope for future generations.

Dont wait for the next nuclear incidence to change the goals of your society! Sunday, Mar 13 2011 

How often have many of us warned about the use of nuclear power and the increased danger of nuclear energy systems in an earthquake situation ?

After the recent history of Japan, one could have hoped for more thoughtfulness towards that topic. After other situations showing how humans cant control all aspects of this  technology, a stopping of it would have appeared evident.

Too much obedience towards an economical profit orientated society can be considered as dangerous too. Will now, after this terrible disaster come a new thoughtful culture setting other values and goals?

I hear the news and the disinformation . I see how some expected a lost of memory in this generation to build more nuclear reactors worldwide and go on using the old dangerous units. I compare the brochures with the reality. I have enough that our society’s remains under the impact of the careless profit of few. It is our responsibility, what kind of society future we create together. How many more warnings and victims do you need to engage yourself against it, wherever you are?

About the attractivity of restrictive concepts of education Sunday, Feb 6 2011 

How much has the middle class assuming of herself to be in the golden middle truth, lost an inner bell who might ring when violence is done to children?
What does it require to a certain class of society to recognise sadism for what it is?
To be an adult, or a parent does not make one spontaneous to a caring wise, and sadly enough reaching over the chain of pain, gets legitimated far too easy. That some still use physical violence is sad enough, but psychological violence has to be seen as harmful too, even if the wounds are first, less visible.
Maybe to be what some would call successful, in our society, some had to repress so much their own natural empathy, that their emotionality points towards thoughtless boredom who confuses each waking up thrill with imposing authority seriousness.
Maybe some yuppies should consider that children are not an extension of their own lifestyle, but real humans who deserve respect and adults who have solved some of their own issues instead of projecting them on the next generation. Each human is unique and requires an individual approach, not  normative rules limiting air in heads and hearts . Ask yourself, do you want unquestioning followers of psychopathic structures or critical self supporting citizen able to love ?

 

Next Page »